#1003Ines Moreau
This case continues a recorded run. Round 1 below is a copy of that recording; the recording itself was not changed. Open the recording
Simulated reply. A reply on this case comes from the demo button: the message was written by us and the photo was generated with Meta's Muse Image. No customer wrote it. The case is not counted in the totals of the cases page, and its claim PDF says so.
Decision
Reship
Send the customer a replacement.
Carrier claim
yes · a claim is prepared for you
Why
- Order #1003 found for Brass table lamp with glass shade
- New sharp daylight photo shows long crack through glass shade with missing chip and shards, consistent with earlier blurry photo of same lamp in box - same story, no fraud
- check_photo_integrity: no signals, no capture dates (normal)
- assess_photos: broken_product, severity major, photoQuality ok, carrier likely at fault
- compute_claim eligible=true, max 102.30 EUR under Colissimo Domicile with signature terms, reserve window closes 2026-10-30T01:02:30.524Z, claim deadline 2027-10-23T02:02:30.524Z
Maximum compensation
The most the carrier's rules allow, worked out by code. Not a promise of payment.
Your review
The agent proposes, you decide. Nothing leaves Gilmend from this page.
Protected demo
This public demo only lets people with the access code approve, edit or reject a case.
Rounds of this case
The customer replied and the agent ran again on this same case, with everything it already knew. The page describes the latest round; the earlier ones are kept here.
Round 1
Customer report 27 Oct 2026, 15:02Muse Spark 1.3RecordedDecision
- Ask for more photos
Carrier claim
- None
Needs a human
- No
Round 2latest
Customer replied 28 Oct 2026, 12:22Muse Spark 1.3Simulated replyNot written by a customer: this is the reply of the demo button, with a photo generated with Meta's Muse Image.
Sorry, my first photo was shaky. Here is a sharper one taken in daylight: the glass shade is cracked all the way down and a chip has come off the rim.
1 new photoDecision
- Reship
Carrier claim
- Up to €102.30
Needs a human
- No
What changed since round 1
- Decision:Ask for more photosbecameReship
- Damage read:UnclearbecameBroken product
- Photo quality:BlurrybecameGood
- Carrier claim:NonebecameUp to €102.30
Customer report and evidence
Round 1: the report
My lamp is damaged, I think the glass is cracked. Here is a photo.
Photos
2 photosThe outline is what SAM 3.1 matched on the photo (the item, its pieces or the box), not a verdict on the damage. The damage itself is read in the assessment below.
Raw photo: not annotated
Round 2: the customer replied
28 Oct 2026, 12:22Simulated replyNot written by a customer: this is the reply of the demo button, with a photo generated with Meta's Muse Image (data/photos/README.md).
Sorry, my first photo was shaky. Here is a sharper one taken in daylight: the glass shade is cracked all the way down and a chip has come off the rim.

Photo 2, as sent by the customer 
Outlined by SAM 3.1: what it matched (the item, its pieces or the box). This image goes in the claim Annotated with SAM 3.1SAM 3.1 outlined 2 regions from 2 concepts: "glass lampshade" 1, "with glass shade" 1 (confidence 0.59, 0.54). The outline shows what SAM matched for these concepts, not the damage itself; it is not a damage verdict.
Integrity
No signalCalled by the agent- Same photo elsewhere
Compared with 1 photo from 1 earlier case and 6 demo photos.
- Photo 1: looks like
- a demo photo: Its own demo photo (reuse by design) (hash distance 0/64 and 0/64)
- Photo 2: no match.
- Photo 1: looks like
- Capture date and delivery
Delivery: 27 Oct 2026, 01:02 UTC.
- Photo 1: no capture date in the file. Most apps strip it, so this is not a signal.
- Photo 2: no capture date in the file. Most apps strip it, so this is not a signal.
- No capture date in the metadata of photo 1, 2. Most apps and messengers strip it when a photo is shared, so a missing date is normal and is not treated as a signal.
- A photo also appears in a case of the same order and customer (or is the demo photo of its own demo case): a report filed again is expected, not a signal.
The comparison uses perceptual hashes: it catches the same file after a resize or a re-save, not a crop, a mirror image, an edit or a photo of a screen. A clean result does not prove the photos are genuine, and a signal is a reason to look, not a verdict on the customer. Cases filed before this check existed hold no hash and cannot be compared.
What the agent saw
- Item
- brass table lamp with glass shade
- Damage
- Broken product
- Severity
- Major
- Carrier likely at fault
- Yes
- Packaging
- Adequate
- Photo quality
- Good
- Long crack running through white glass lampshade
- Chip missing from rim of shade with loose glass shards on packing paper
- Brass lamp base appears intact inside open cardboard box with crumpled brown paper
- New sharp daylight photo consistent with earlier blurry photo of lamp in box
Order
- Order
- #1003
- Customer
- Ines Moreau
- Total
- €129
- Carrier
- Colissimo Domicile avec signature
- Tracking number
- 6A99001003003
- Weight
- 3.1 kg
- Delivered
- 27 Oct 2026
- Ship to
- Lille, FR
- 1 × Brass table lamp with glass shade€129
Carrier claim
EligibleComputed by code from the carrier's rules, not by the model.
- Max. compensation
- €102.30
- Claim deadline
- 23 Oct 2027356 days left
- Reserves due by
- 30 Oct 2026, 02:02
- Damage to the goods is documented: broken product, severity major.
- The carrier is the likely cause of the damage.
- The customer reported the damage 13.0 h after delivery, inside the 72 h reserve window (closes 2026-10-30T01:02Z).
- Maximum compensation: min(item value 129.00 EUR, 33 EUR/kg x 3.1 kg = 102.30 EUR, cap 990.00 EUR) = 102.30 EUR under Colissimo Domicile with signature terms.
- The claim must be filed by 2027-10-23T02:02Z (359 days left).
- Note: Colissimo pays the purchase value of the content (supplier invoice), or 70% of the sale value without one. This ceiling uses the order's sale price, so the final indemnity may be lower.
Carrier rules used: Colissimo (La Poste)
- Compensation
- €23 per kg, capped at €690
- Reserves within
- 72 h of delivery
- Claim within
- 365 days
- UnverifiedThe 3-day reserve window (L133-3) is applied to Colissimo out of prudence only; no official text confirms it for La Poste parcels. It never blocks a claim, it only adds a warning.
- Dated sourceThe amounts (23 EUR/kg, 690 EUR, 33 EUR/kg, 990 EUR) and the 12-month limit come from the 2020-12-08 edition of the general terms; the 2026 edition is not public. Ask the merchant's Colissimo adviser for the current contract.
- Colissimo pays the purchase value of the content (supplier invoice), or 70% of the sale value without one. The order only carries the sale price, so the ceiling computed here uses the sale price and the real indemnity may be lower.
- No indemnity when the packaging is unsuitable for the content, and no indirect damage. Shipping fees are refunded only for a total loss. Only the weight measured by La Poste counts; the order's declared weight is used here.
- The ad valorem option (up to 1000 or 5000 EUR) replaces the standard indemnity and is not modelled; the order does not say whether it was bought. A high-value parcel must go to a human.
- Claims are filed by the merchant in the Colissimo Box tracking tool (OSC); no claim API was found.
Figures and how sure we are
- Indemnity per kg (standard offers): 23 EUR/kg
Read in the 2020-12-08 edition. The 2026 general terms are not public, so the current figure is not confirmed.
Dated sourcechecked 27 Oct 2026 - Cap per parcel (standard offers): 690 EUR
Same edition as above. Applies to parcels over 1 kg; up to 1 kg the indemnity is 23 EUR/kg prorated by weight.
Dated sourcechecked 27 Oct 2026 - Domicile with signature: 33 EUR/kg, cap 990 EUR: 33 EUR/kg, 990 EUR
Same edition as above.
Dated sourcechecked 27 Oct 2026 - Time limit to claim: 12 months from the day after pick-up (France)
Modelled as 365 days counted from the order creation date, because the order has no pick-up date; this is earlier than the real deadline, so it errs on the safe side.
Dated sourcechecked 27 Oct 2026 - Reserve window after delivery: 72 h (prudential)
L133-3 itself was read, but we could not confirm that it applies to Colissimo parcels (postal regime). The Colissimo general terms set no such deadline. Applied as a warning only, never as a hard block.
Unverifiedchecked 27 Oct 2026
Sources
Claim document
E-mail to the carrier's claims department
Ready to send. Gilmend does not send it.
- Subject
- Damage claim - parcel 6A99001003003 - order #1003
Dear Sir or Madam, I am writing on behalf of Maison Demo (demo merchant), sender of the parcel below, to report damage found when the parcel was opened. - Carrier: Colissimo (La Poste) (Colissimo Domicile avec signature) - Tracking number: 6A99001003003 - Order: #1003 - Weight: 3.1 kg - Value of the contents: €129.00 - Delivered on: 27 October 2026 - Damage reported on: 27 October 2026 Damage found: brass table lamp with glass shade (product broken or damaged, major damage). The attached photos show the state of the parcel and of the product. Compensation claimed: €102.30, under the terms of your contract (details in the attached claim file). This claim is filed in time: the claim deadline is 23 October 2027, 04:02 (Paris time). Reserve deadline: 30 October 2026, 02:02 (Paris time). Please find attached the claim file (PDF) and the photos. The purchase invoice of the contents follows or is attached separately. Please confirm receipt of this claim and keep me informed of its progress. Kind regards, Maison Demo (demo merchant) 12 rue de la Démo, 75011 Paris, France claims@maison-demo.example
Reply to the customer
Drafted by the agent. It is only sent if you send it yourself.
Agent reasoning trace
26 stepsShow traceHide trace
Newest step first: the outcome, then how the agent got there. Amounts and deadlines are worked out by code, never by the model.
Round 2the customer's reply · 18 steps
- Muse Spark 1.3 reads, reasons, writes
- SAM 3.1 outlines what it matches
- Code rules, maths, documents
- Guardrail code that corrects the model
- Case ready for review: reship
- Engine: muse-spark-1.3 (Muse Spark 1.3 (Meta Model API))
- This case continues the recorded run real_demo-3-photo-blurry, which is left untouched: round 1 of this case is a copy of it.
Round 1the report · 8 steps
- Muse Spark 1.3 reads, reasons, writes
- SAM 3.1 outlines what it matches
- Code rules, maths, documents
- Guardrail code that corrects the model
- Case ready for review: ask_more_photos
- Engine: muse-spark-1.3 (Muse Spark 1.3 (Meta Model API))
